Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Doors topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic commission asks 13 DeWine homeowner to explore alternatives before approving replacement doors
Summary
Commissioners postponed action on a proposal to replace two full‑height patio doors at 13 DeWine with doors that include transoms, asking the owner to research restoration, salvage and custom-reproduction options and to return with additional information.
The Poughkeepsie Historic Districts and Landmarks Preservation Commission on the application for 13 DeWine did not approve a proposed replacement of two full-height patio doors; commissioners asked the homeowner to pursue other options and adjourned the application for further review.
The applicant (homeowner) described severe rot in a pair of stacked French doors and said he had procured replacement doors from a vendor (Window World). A Window World representative introduced himself during the hearing: “I’m Bill with Window World. I’m just here for support.” Commissioners and the applicant discussed dimensions, transoms and the visual effect of divided lights versus a single‑pane modern door.
The applicant said he had solicited quotes from major manufacturers and said, "Anderson and Pella want $35,000 to replace 2 doors," citing cost as a limiting factor in choosing custom wood reproductions. Commissioners acknowledged the homeowner’s cost concerns but said the commission’s guidance calls for materials and visual proportions that match the historic character. They suggested several alternatives: salvaged doors from architectural‑salvage dealers, custom reproduction by carpenters or specialist vendors, simulated‑divided‑light options, and consulting a restoration architect or carpenter experienced with historic homes.
Commissioners noted differences between the two doors (the second floor door is slightly taller) and asked the applicant to return with additional options, measurements and cost estimates. The commission agreed to adjourn the application to allow the homeowner time to gather alternatives; staff was directed to provide guidance and vendor references. No final approval or denial was reached at the hearing.
The owner said he would consider plywooding the openings temporarily if necessary and return to the commission after further due diligence. Commissioners emphasized they would be open to revisiting the application if the applicant submitted options closer to the original appearance and materials.
