Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City presents fiscal year 2024–25 second-quarter CIP and financial snapshot; no red flags reported

3987908 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff reviewed the city’s second-quarter capital improvements program (CIP) and general and enterprise fund positions as of Dec. 31, 2024, noting timing-driven variances, carryovers and major project spending.

Justin Sorensen, a city finance presenter, reviewed the fiscal year 2024–25 second-quarter CIP and the city’s broader financial position at the March 11 work session.

Sorensen said the CIP appropriation figure shown in the packet was about $24 million for the year to date; that total includes an $8 million transfer from the general fund moved into the CIP in December and still awaiting appropriation to specific projects. He reported more than 100 CIP projects had funding and that spending during the second quarter totaled about $9 million in the CIP fund, mainly for two projects: the Marshall White Center and Twentieth Street improvements.

On enterprise funds, Sorensen explained timing and carryover effects cause some budgets to appear large versus revenues. He said the water, sanitary and storm utilities show higher budgeted amounts because prior-year appropriations for multi-year projects carry forward into the current fiscal budget even when the related revenues were received earlier. He added utility capital spending (for example, pipe replacement) drove nearly $2.5 million in water fund expenditures during the quarter.

Sorensen also pointed to a $730,000 two-year appropriation for Mount Ogden golf-course irrigation work and said the airport fund showed $46,000 posted as of Dec. 31 pending terminal-related invoices in subsequent quarters.

On general fund revenues, Sorensen said taxes made up the bulk and, at Dec. 31, the city had received about 53% of expected general-fund revenue (a figure adjusted by timing differences such as when sales tax and property tax distributions arrive). He reported sales tax collections through the most recent distribution were tracking on budget and that class B and C road funds were higher than anticipated to date.

Council members asked clarifying questions about budget carryovers, the property-management/BDO fund timing, and why some internal-service and enterprise funds show expenditures that appear to outpace revenues; Sorensen answered that many recorded transfers and budget carryovers account for the appearance and that there were no current “red flags” identified by the finance office.

No formal council action was requested or taken during the presentation.