Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Flooding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Homeowner warns Mohawk Riverfront development may raise flood risk for East Front Street

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A long-time homeowner told the Schenectady City Council he is concerned recent waterfront alterations and new construction in the Mohawk River floodplain could increase flood risk to properties on River Street, citing a 2011 flood that damaged his home.

Martin Beister, who identified himself as owner of a family home at 18 River Street in Schenectady's East Front Street neighborhood, told the City Council on April 28 that recent clearing and construction near the riverfront may increase flood risk to adjacent homes.

Beister said his home has been in his family since 1924 and in his care since 1994. He said that after a 2011 flood that inundated his house he spent about $65,000 to recover and is concerned that backfilling and new structures in the Mohawk River floodplain could push floodwaters toward River Street. He told the council the National Grid substation near his property and earlier riverfront development have altered the floodplain and that a levee's lowest point could be breached in high water.

“I am deeply concerned that any further development within this flood plain, especially in its current configuration, will increase the risk of flooding to my property,” Beister said, urging the council to require a full evaluation by a competent organization such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Why it matters: If development changes the floodplain or raises base flood levels, nearby homeowners report potential damage and economic loss. Beister requested that the council prioritize a thorough flood-risk review and consider protections or compensation for affected residents. The council did not take formal action on the comment during the meeting; the transcript records the remarks as part of public comment.

The transcript shows the mayor and council acknowledged receipt of Beister's comments and noted a copy of his materials was left with the clerk.