Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Traffic Enforcement And Housing Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Schenectady council places three home-rule resolutions on consent agenda for camera demos and rental-registration changes
Summary
The Schenectady City Council on April 14 placed three resolutions on the consent agenda supporting home‑rule requests to New York State for two traffic‑camera demonstration programs and a change tied to the city's rental‑property registration rules.
The Schenectady City Council on April 14 placed three resolutions on the consent agenda supporting home-rule requests to the State of New York for two traffic‑camera demonstration programs and requesting a state law change tied to the city’s rental‑property registration rules.
The items read into the record were: (1) a resolution supporting a home‑rule request to allow the city to implement a school speed‑zone camera demonstration program; (2) a resolution supporting a home‑rule request to allow the city to implement a red‑light camera demonstration program; and (3) a resolution requesting amendments to the New York State Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to require compliance with the city code related to rental residential property registration for eviction proceedings. The clerk read each item aloud during the meeting.
Council members moved each item to the floor and then moved each item onto the consent agenda. For the first item a council member moved that item 19 be placed on the floor and Miss Patrick seconded; subsequent motions to place each item on the consent agenda drew no objections and the chair declared them placed on consent. No roll‑call tallies were recorded in the meeting transcript; each item was advanced by unanimous consent with vocal “Aye” responses.
The resolutions are procedural steps asking the state to permit the city to test automated enforcement technologies and to amend state eviction‑related procedures so that city rental‑registration requirements are recognized in filing or processing eviction cases. The council’s action on April 14 placed the resolutions on the consent agenda for final action at a later point in the council’s process.
The transcript does not record further debate on the substance of the demonstration programs or the specific statutory language sought for the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law amendment. The clerk and council members did not provide implementation details, cost estimates, enforcement plans, or effective dates during the portion of the meeting that recorded these motions.
Votes at a glance
- Item 19a — Resolution supporting a home‑rule request for a school speed‑zone camera demonstration program: moved to floor by an unnamed council member; seconded by Miss Patrick; placed on the consent agenda by unanimous consent (no roll‑call recorded).
- Item 19b — Resolution supporting a home‑rule request for a red‑light camera demonstration program: moved and placed on the consent agenda by unanimous consent (no roll‑call recorded).
- Item 19c — Resolution requesting amendments to the New York State Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to require compliance with the city rental registration code for eviction proceedings: moved and placed on the consent agenda by unanimous consent (no roll‑call recorded).
