Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Review Legal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays vote on outside legal services for Charter Review Commission after questions about need and cost
Summary
Council members questioned why the Charter Review Commission would require outside legal counsel when corporation counsel is available; the council made the $25,000 transfer proposal agenda-dependent pending clarification of scope and justification.
Get email alerts on the Charter Review Legal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mount Vernon City Council on Monday held off action on a proposed $25,000 outside-legal-services transfer to support the Charter Review Commission after members questioned why outside counsel was necessary when corporation counsel and legal staff exist.
The item originated with the Office of the Controller, which proposed a budget transfer to contract for outside legal support for the Charter Review Commission. Council members pressed for details about the need and cost. A council member summarized the recommendation: "Not sure. Now this is a recommendation from the controller. 25,000 to transfer based on, I guess, 7." The controller explained the proposed terms in part, saying the arrangement "outlines the actual the the amount. It's, like, $300 per hour for for for a certain amount of hours."
Council members said that raised questions about why the city should pay outside counsel while corporation counsel is available to advise. The council voted to remove the item from immediate action and make it agenda-dependent so that additional information — including a justification for outside counsel and specifics about hours and hourly rate — could be provided before final consideration. One council member said they hoped to have answers by Wednesday; the clerk and staff were asked to follow up.
No formal contract award or budget transfer took place at the work session. The council directed staff to supply clearer documentation of the proposed arrangement, including whether corporation counsel could provide the same services and a detailed cost estimate, before the item returns to a future agenda.

