Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Access Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter presses council for clarity on $50,000 audiovisual upgrade and public-streaming access
Summary
At the April 9 Mount Vernon council meeting a public commenter asked for status and documentation related to an audiovisual upgrade and a payment to audiovisual services, raised concerns about missing Zoom/streaming access, and urged broader public input and engagement in equipment selection.
Jeff Monroe, a member of the public who said he works professionally in audiovisual systems, asked the council for a progress report on payments and plans for an audiovisual upgrade for the council meeting room. Monroe said he had sought information about a payout to what he described as a vendor for audiovisual services and raised concerns about a roughly $50,000 allocation for equipment, questioning whether the city had sought public input or engaged the Cable Advisory Committee.
"I see the speakers, and we have a questionable mic system, but I don't see the actual payout or plan for the actual system that was ... allocated somewhere in the range of $50,000," Monroe said. He urged the council to enable modern streaming and display capabilities so members of the public can both speak and, when needed, show photos or other materials.
Council members responded that they would ask management services to review Monroe’s suggestions and requested that he provide a short written list of recommended equipment and configuration options. Council members said they want durable equipment that will last and asked staff to check where money is being spent and when. Council member Boxhill invited Monroe to provide e-mailed specifications for staff review; Councilwoman Gleeson said she will coordinate a meeting with the commissioner of public works and suggested creating a public survey or criteria for upgrades. Council member Thompson noted the need for equipment that will sustain over the years and welcomed Monroe’s input.
No formal ordinance or contract action was recorded on the audiovisual question during the meeting; council members directed staff and management services to follow up and review the proposed scope and costs before any final procurement.
Ending
Council members asked Monroe to submit a written proposal to management services and indicated staff would follow up with the council and the Cable Advisory Committee as appropriate.
