Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Easement Abandonment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners pause action on North Fork/Lower Willow Creek easement amid board and shareholder concerns
Summary
The board heard extensive public comment about a petition to abandon a county easement providing access to a dam and irrigation infrastructure; the county deferred a decision at the request of irrigation-district directors and shareholders to allow fuller notice and review.
Get email alerts on the Easement Abandonment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Granite County Board of Commissioners took public comment Feb. 4 on a proposed abandonment of a portion of the North Fork/Lower Willow Creek easement that would affect access to an agricultural dam and related irrigation facilities. After sustained comment from irrigation-district directors and local shareholders, the board agreed to delay any formal action until the irrigation district’s full board and shareholders have had an opportunity to meet and review documentation.
Representatives associated with the irrigation district said the easement and related documents were not circulated to all directors or shareholders and that signatures on a related petition and recorded easement have raised concerns among landowners. Several speakers urged the district to convene a meeting of directors and shareholders to review the recorded easement language, the district’s acknowledgment letter circulating for signatures, and potential effects on dam access and emergency operations.
Patty (identified in the transcript as speaking for the district) told the board that she and Dan Hoffman had not seen the recorded easement and that both directors and shareholders need notice and time to consider the implications. Speakers raised dam-safety concerns, including whether gates or locked access could impede emergency responses to spillway or maintenance needs. Mike (a representative speaking on behalf of parties involved in the easement process) told the board that the district planned to circulate an acknowledgment letter and hoped to present a unanimous acknowledgement at a future meeting; he asked to table the discussion for additional time.
Commissioners and district representatives agreed to pursue a follow-up meeting: the county will keep the item on a future agenda and awaited a date from the irrigation district for a fuller discussion. The board did not take a final vote on abandonment during the Feb. 4 session and characterized the item as "tabled" pending further information and participation from ill or absent district directors.
The county clerk will accept written comments and correspondence to be added to the record while the district arranges meetings with shareholders and directors.

