Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews large policy batches; action on some policies delayed for public input
Summary
The board reviewed two large policy batches—an instructional set (21 policies) and a facilities/facility-use set—and directed staff to wait the 30-day public input period before acting on Policy P10-08-002; trustees asked for clearer wording and definitions in several policies.
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the March 13 work session the School Board reviewed two policy batches: a 21-policy instructional package and a facilities/facility-use package (items 3.03–3.24 and 3.25–3.34 on the agenda). Board members asked staff and the policy committee to clarify specific language, and staff said the policies are for review and are scheduled for action at the April 17 meeting after public input as required.
Superintendent Dr. Cashwell told the board that policy P10-08-002 would not be acted on that day; the board and staff will wait a full 30-day public-input period before returning the item to the board in April. Board members also discussed definitions and implementation guidance for several instructional policies, including a proposed revision to P7-11 (controversial subjects) where trustees asked for clearer guidance on what the policy means by terms such as “credible” sources and “partisan or sectarian” literature, and P7-13 (the school day) where trustees praised language acknowledging student wellness and asked how the division will ensure consistent local understanding.
On the school calendar policy (3.03/2019), trustees asked staff to clarify the sentence requiring the annual calendar to be presented “prior to the March meeting each year,” with suggestions to either specify which March meeting or remove the fixed-month language to provide flexibility in extraordinary years. Committee chairs and staff said advisory groups including CEAC (special education advisory) and principal representatives had reviewed and provided input on several items in the package. The board asked staff to refine language and return revised drafts at the next review cycle.

