Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Groves EDC workshop outlines limited discretionary funds, grants program and officer elections
Summary
At a May workshop the Groves Economic Development Corporation’s staff briefed new board members on EDC bylaws, the organization’s funding (0.5% local sales tax), existing debt commitments, a roughly $1.4 million fund balance and grant rules emphasizing reimbursement-based awards to sales-tax-paying businesses.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The newly constituted Groves Economic Development Corporation board met in workshop format May 12 for a staff briefing on bylaws, funding, grant rules and board operations; no formal action was taken.
Finance Director and EDC executive director Lamar Ausley led the presentation, explaining that Groves receives a 0.5 percentage point share of local sales tax for EDC purposes (one-half of the city’s 1.5 percent local sales-tax allocation). Using recent five-year averages, Ausley estimated Groves sales-tax receipts around $3 million annually, which would translate to roughly $900,000 for the EDC.
Why it matters: Most of that revenue is already committed. Ausley told the board the EDC is servicing a long-term bond payment related to the new fire station and prior wastewater-plant financing; the annual debt payment is about $582,000. The city council also directed a transfer of $225,000 to the city this year to account for administrative and shared costs, leaving the EDC limited discretionary funds for grants and projects.
Key points staff told the board:
- Fund balance and budget: Ausley said the EDC has an approximate fund balance in the low seven figures (he referenced about $1,415,000 as an approximate figure) and that the board should avoid drawing down reserves without council approval. He said typical annual grant spending has averaged about $50,000 to $100,000 in recent years.
- Grant program rules: The EDC’s grant program is reimbursement-based; applicants must submit receipts and documentation after completing proposed work. Eligibility is currently limited to sales-tax-paying businesses; prior EDC policy excludes nonprofits unless the board and council change that policy. Grants over certain thresholds (roughly amounts above $10,000 in a category) require city-council approval before disbursement.
- Uses and trade-offs: Ausley explained that if the board prioritized larger capital contributions (for example, bond payments or infrastructure matching), it could recommend reallocating EDC funds to those uses, but such changes would require council approval and careful financial planning.
- Governance and compliance: City attorney Brandon Monk reviewed the Open Meetings Act and board procedures, noting agendas must be posted 72 hours before meetings, executive sessions are limited to statutorily authorized topics, and a quorum (four of seven members) is required to take action. He also cautioned against serial communications and ‘reply all’ emails that could create a de facto meeting outside public notice.
- Board operations: Ausley reviewed officer roles and the timeline for formal officer appointments: temporary nominations at the next meeting and official appointments at the end of the fiscal year (Groves’ fiscal year runs October–September). He encouraged members to review bylaws and to propose an annual work plan with goals, to be graded at fiscal year end and reported to council.
- Training and meetings: Ausley noted state EDC training options and said the executive director and president should attend required training; he suggested the board consider an in-person consultant-led training session for the board and neighboring jurisdictions. He also noted the ability to hold special meetings if time-sensitive matters arise.
Board members asked questions about eligibility, fee structures, meeting schedules and the administrative transfer to the city. Ausley and Monk answered operational and legal questions; the session closed as a workshop with no votes or ordinances adopted.

