Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Judge Charter Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bridgeton council approves charter amendment altering municipal judge reappointment language

3838909 · January 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved an amendment to bill 64-74 changing charter language about the municipal judge's two-year reappointment timing; amendment and final passage passed unanimously.

Council member Luther moved and the council approved an amendment to a charter-change ordinance concerning the municipal judge's reappointment schedule, then passed the amended measure on second reading.

The amendment to bill 64-74, offered by Council member Luther and seconded by Council member Luke, revises subsections of section 4.02 of the City of Bridgeton charter to reflect a two-year reappointment process for the municipal judge. City Attorney Boca told the council the change was requested after the previous meeting and aligns the charter language with the statutory two-year reappointment practice used by several charter cities.

The amendment clarified two points, Boca said: (1) the charter language now explicitly reflects a two-year reappointment term for the municipal judge consistent with state statute and comparable charter cities; and (2) the charter change will not take effect until after the next two-year term (in April 2025). Council members asked for the substantive changes to be summarized for the public during the discussion period; Boca and the mayor provided that summary.

By roll call the council approved the amendment 8-0. The council then voted to enact bill 64-74 as amended; council minutes record the ordinance adoption following the amendment vote.

Votes at a glance: amendment to bill 64-74 — roll call 8-0 in favor; final passage — recorded as approved following the amendment (council stated the amended bill would become an ordinance).