Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Complaint Freedom To Read topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joint committee dismisses complaint alleging ethics violations tied to Freedom to Read Act
Summary
The Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards voted to dismiss a 120-page complaint from Christine Livesay that accused legislators of ethics violations related to the Freedom to Read Act, finding most allegations outside the committee’s jurisdiction and no probable cause for the narrow claims within its remit.
The Joint Legislative Committee on Ethical Standards voted Feb. 18 to dismiss an ethics complaint filed by Christine Livesay that alleged legislators who supported the Freedom to Read Act violated the public trust.
Assistant counsel Caitlin Metz told the committee the complaint, submitted with a signature and extensive exhibits, alleged the act granted certain public employees civil and criminal immunity and that selected books with explicit content became accessible to minors in school libraries. Metz said respondents’ counsel argued the complaint amounted to a political attack on legislation rather than an enforceable ethics violation and urged dismissal.
Counsel’s report said most of Livesay’s allegations fall outside the committee’s jurisdiction because they challenge the wisdom of enacted legislation and raise constitutional questions. Metz recommended dismissal for lack of jurisdiction on those counts and, as to the narrower claims within jurisdiction — allegations that some legislators misused public funds for social-media posts and that campaign contributions from the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) created a quid pro quo — recommended dismissal for lack of probable cause.
“Most of the allegations are outside the joint committee’s jurisdiction,” assistant counsel Caitlin Metz said, summarizing counsel’s findings that routine constituent communications and social-media outreach are not per se misuse of public funds and that the complaint offered no evidence tying campaign contributions to a corrupt agreement.
Counsel noted the joint committee’s limited role on campaign contributions, observing the Election Law Enforcement Commission generally enforces campaign finance laws. Metz also said the probable-cause standard requires sufficient factual support that an ethics violation is plausible; according to counsel, Livesay’s submissions did not meet that threshold for the misuse-of-funds or quid-pro-quo claims.
The complaint, Metz said, included roughly 120 pages of exhibits and supplemental submissions; respondents filed written responses through counsel. The complaint named, among others, Senators Zwicker and Ruiz as recipients of NJEA contributions referenced in the filing.
On a recorded vote the committee dismissed the complaint. The roll call recorded present yes votes from Mister Billick, Chairman Mayo, Mister Mitsner, Assemblywoman Quigley, Mister Salerno, Vice Chairman Scrivo and Miss Weisberg; Mister Toscano was absent. The motion carried.
