Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge Huntsville to plan for state and federal library funding losses
Summary
Multiple public commenters told council that Alabama Public Library Service and federal Institute of Museum and Library Services funding cuts threaten local library programs and urged Huntsville and neighboring governments to step up funding to preserve services and collections.
Several speakers during the public comment portion of the April 10 Huntsville City Council meeting urged city leaders to plan for potential state and federal funding losses for libraries and to consider local funding measures to protect services.
Alex Kimian, a resident of District 3, told council that federal funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is uncertain after recent national events and that the Alabama Public Library Service (APLS) had proposed cuts. Kimian said the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) grant — distributed by IMLS and administered through APLS — has supported ReadySet kindergarten, digital-archiving projects, STEM kits and public-computer access. He said losing federal and state funds would reduce Huntsville Madison County Public Library’s per-capita spending from about $20 to $19 and would strain operations and staffing.
Marissa Allison told council she was concerned those funding pressures are tied to recent actions by APLS and that state-level decisions were targeting LGBTQ- and transgender-related materials; Allison said those decisions have resulted in funding threats to libraries that do not comply with the contested directives. Allison urged Huntsville, the City of Madison and Madison County to fully fund the library system so it will not be subject to state-level funding pressures.
Kimian and Allison asked the council to work with Madison City and Madison County to find alternative local funding sources and to consider making the library system less dependent on state-distributed funds should APLS or federal funding be reduced.
Council did not take action on funding at the meeting; the speakers asked elected leaders to examine options for local appropriations or intergovernmental cooperation. The speakers cited existing cuts and increased operating costs that have reduced staff raises and collections budgets.
The Record: Public comment statements about library funding and APLS/IMLS were delivered at the April 10 meeting and are included in the meeting record.
