Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts set of VSBA policy updates; members flag reporting and social‑media access language for later review
Summary
The school board approved a large package of VSBA policy updates but paused for further review on a student‑safety reporting policy and language allowing requests for social‑media login credentials during investigations.
Get email alerts on the Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Gloucester County School Board on Thursday approved a large package of policy updates provided by the Virginia School Boards Association (VSBA) but paused on a single policy addressing reporting and threat notification (CLA) after members raised substantive concerns about wording.
Policy staff and counsel described the updates as largely cross‑reference and technical changes recommended by VSBA. The board voted to adopt the policies as presented with the exception of CLA (reporting acts of violence and substance abuse), which members asked to revisit.
Board discussion centered on two substantive points: (1) language in the CLA draft that staff and at least one board member said should explicitly require reporting of verbal threats as well as written or physical actions; and (2) a clause in GAD (employee conduct / social media) that says the division may request an employee’s username and password for a personal social‑media account if activity is “reasonably believed” to be relevant to an investigation. Several board members objected to the password language on privacy and process grounds and asked staff to confirm whether the wording is mandated by state law or VSBA model text.
Policy manager Mr. Hartley (staff) confirmed the VSBA templates and noted the board’s option to request legal review. Multiple board members asked staff to consult the county attorney and the VSBA attorney subscription to confirm intent and legality. The board adopted the package as read while leaving the CLA item for further review; staff said they would return with edits or legal advice for the board to consider.
No immediate personnel action resulted; the board directed staff to check statutory references and the VSBA model language, and to return CLA and any proposed changes to GAD wording for board consideration in a future meeting.
Vote: the board approved the policy omnibus as presented (roll-call recorded: Drew — yes; Parker — yes; Anderson — yes; Solomon — yes; Scruggs — yes; Brewer — yes; Arsenovic — yes).
