Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves amendments to animal ordinance; revises ‘service animal’ and adds sanitary definition
Summary
On second consideration the council approved amendments to Chapter 6.04 (Animals) that add a sanitary-conditions definition and revise the city’s service-animal definition to align with ADA guidance, after staff and civil-rights review.
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Davenport City Council approved amendments to Chapter 6.04 of the municipal code on second consideration, adopting a new definition for “sanitary conditions” and revising the definition of “service animal” to mirror language consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Alderman Burkholder offered the amendment, which added the definition: “sanitary conditions means premise free from accumulated waste, offensive odors, overcrowding, insects, or rodents due to animal keeping or health or safety risk to humans and animals.” The amendment also revised the service-animal definition to read in part: “Service animal means a dog or miniature horse that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability ... The crime deterrent effects of the animal's presence and the provision of emotional support, well-being, or companionship do not constitute work or task for the purpose of this definition.”
Burkholder said the language had been reviewed by the Humane Society of Scott County and city legal staff. “Director Lacey from the civil rights division also reviewed it and provided input about matching language with the ADA for clarity for our citizens,” the record shows.
After limited discussion and no public opposition, the council conducted a roll call and the amendment passed. Council members thanked staff and volunteers who contributed to the joint task-force recommendations underlying the ordinance rewrite.
Why this matters: the changes refine enforcement language about animal-keeping conditions and aim to reduce conflicts by clarifying which animals qualify as service animals under federal guidance. The ordinance itself is a replacement of Chapter 6.04 and had been listed as second consideration on the finance agenda.
What was not decided: the meeting approved the amendment on second consideration; the transcript does not show final adoption language beyond the amendment vote or any implementation schedule for enforcement changes.
Next steps: staff and legal counsel will continue with the ordinance process and return any further required materials to council.

