Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Literacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Franklin County school board rejects division literacy plan after heated debate over Bookworms curriculum
Summary
After hours of discussion and public questions about book content and parent access, the Franklin County School Board voted 5-3 to reject the division'wide literacy plan that would have adopted Bookworms materials for middle grades and formalized rollout changes for K-5.
Get email alerts on the Education Literacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Franklin County School Board on Thursday voted 5-3 to reject a proposed two-year division literacy plan that adopts the Bookworms knowledge-building curriculum for middle school and formalizes changes to K-5 instruction under the Virginia Literacy Act.
Board members said they needed more time and information about the middle-school novels, how parents can access or opt students out of specific texts, and last-minute state changes to allowable interventions. The vote followed more than two hours of staff presentations, teacher feedback summaries and a lengthy public exchange about specific novels and classroom implementation.
Superintendent David Sears and literacy staff defended the plan as already producing measurable gains in elementary reading benchmarks. "Students have increased their average words correct per minute from 17 in the fall to 56 in the spring," literacy lead Ms. Muse told the board, pointing to oral reading fluency data she said is still being finalized.
But several board members said they were not comfortable approving the plan without more information about titles and secondary options. Miss Greer said she needed "more time to look at some of the stuff" before approving. Other members raised concerns about the process for notifying parents and the practical effect of existing opt-out options, which they said could require students who opt out to work independently and miss whole-group discussions.
Staff told the board that the division will provide parents a syllabus and short summaries for each novel, and that the district already has an opt-out process for families who object to specific texts. Staff also said a state decision the same morning required removing a reference to the intervention program HD Word from the 6-8 plan even though the division intends to keep using it for students with IEPs; that change will be made before resubmission.
After the failed motion (Yes: Whiting, Worley, McCray; No: Greer, Holly, Agee, Slocum, Dr. David), board members asked staff to provide a set of follow-up materials in advance of the next meeting: a working list of middle-school titles with public links, documentation of the state-approved curriculum options that were evaluated, summaries of teacher feedback from the end-of-year survey, and clarification on parent access to classroom texts and library holdings. Staff said they will correct an inaccessible link in the meeting materials and return with edits and the requested documentation for a June vote.
The board also heard that the state deadline to submit the plan to the Virginia Department of Education is mid-June; staff said they will seek to return at the June meeting with the requested materials and a revised plan for final action.
What the board did not do Thursday was adopt the plan; the rejection means current instructional materials will continue under existing practices until the board takes further action. Staff said teachers will continue curriculum work over the summer and that the division will host a literacy summit in June for teacher planning and consistent implementation guidance.
