Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Business Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves Munchies at 57 South Ocean Avenue amid public concern about restaurant saturation and rideshare congestion

3754762 · April 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved an application for Munchies, a primarily takeout restaurant with limited seating at 57 South Ocean Avenue. Public commenters, including nearby restaurant owners, raised concerns about competition, parking, rideshare congestion and late-night hours.

The Village of Patchogue Planning Board on April 22 approved an application for Munchies, a takeout-focused restaurant with limited seating at 57 South Ocean Avenue.

The applicant, who identified himself as Arvendam (no last name recorded on the transcript), told the board the operation will be primarily counter service with seating for about 10–12 people and a new kitchen and exhaust system. “It mostly takeout,” the applicant said. “But we want some seating too.” He said existing handicap-accessible restroom facilities are in place and that the business operates similar hours at other locations.

Several nearby business owners and residents spoke during the public comment period. A letter read into the record by an existing restaurateur (Mazda Mediterranean) warned that another takeout restaurant across the street could “dramatically affect our ability to remain open” and cited concerns about traffic, parking and pedestrian safety. Multiple commenters raised the issue of rideshare drivers stopping and causing short-term congestion on South Ocean Avenue and urged the village to consider short-term curb rules or dedicated pickup areas.

Board members responded that the planning board’s authority is limited on competition grounds and that zoning allows the proposed use in that business zone (E3). A board member observed that a master plan could guide long-term use patterns but that zoning and courts typically limit the village’s ability to restrict uses solely on market-competition grounds.

The applicant said proposed hours for other locations include late-night service (in one location described as 10 a.m. to 3 a.m.); board counsel noted the village rules on hours and any required variances would have to be followed. The board approved the application by voice vote with a stipulation that signage and window lettering require review by the Architectural Review / Advisory Board before installation.

No formal vote tally was recorded in the meeting transcript; the motion was approved on a voice vote. The board did not attach additional parking-management conditions, though members and commenters suggested village-level parking or curb-time changes might be examined outside of this permit review.