Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Modification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board backs conditional modification to Hall Lane plan, sets conditions on waivers and hydrant
Summary
The board signaled support for modifying a 1989 subdivision plan to allow one additional house on Lot 2A with road improvements and waivers; members required conditions including no further subdivision, installation of a fire hydrant, and a maintenance agreement for the private roadway.
Brian Wall, attorney for the applicant James Hall, and Mike Borselli of Falmouth Engineering outlined a plan to modify a 1989 subdivision so Lot 2A (about 4.76 acres) can host a single‑family home without further subdivision.
Wall said the 1989 plan included a notation that Lot 2A “shall not be built upon until the road is constructed to subdivision control law standards.” The applicant asked the board to remove that note because no further subdivision is proposed and because the modification includes measured improvements to the existing gravel travel surface rather than a full, newly paved public road.
Engineer Mike Borselli said the proposal would improve the existing crushed‑stone travel surface from about 14 feet to 18 feet with 2‑foot shoulders, add a hammerhead turnaround sized for emergency apparatus, and extend the road roughly 150 feet to serve the one new house. He said the water main installed by an adjacent subdivision is available and the applicant proposes to extend the existing eight‑inch water main a short distance and install a hydrant at the turnaround; the owner would be responsible for hydrant installation.
Board members and staff discussed waivers from specific subdivision standards, a condition that no further subdivision of Lot 2A be allowed, and a long‑term maintenance obligation so the roadway remains passable and cleared of vegetation. The fire department’s referrals were discussed: the department recommended an 18‑foot travel width with shoulders and a vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches; the applicant agreed to those dimensions and expressed willingness to install a hydrant despite a referral that for a single family home a hydrant may not be strictly required.
Planning staff recommended drafting a positive motion for a future meeting with conditions including removal of the note, approval of the requested waivers, installation of a hydrant on the town water main, a recorded restriction prohibiting future subdivision of Lot 2A, and a covenant or easement requiring owners to maintain the way.
The public raised no objections at the hearing; the board voted to close the public hearing and asked staff to prepare a positive motion for the next meeting.
