Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Disaster Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff reports EF-2 tornado damage: 525 structures affected, recovery and mitigation steps underway
Summary
City staff summarized damage from the March tornado: an EF-2 event with an approximately 8.7-mile track through Rolla and Phelps County, about 525 buildings affected (20 destroyed, ~60 major damage), dozens of permits issued and recovery work ongoing; staff emphasized mitigation, building codes and storm shelter considerations.
City staff provided a briefing on the March tornado that struck Rolla, reporting an EF-2 event with a radar-estimated peak wind near 120 mph, an 8.7-mile track through parts of Rolla and Phelps County, and concentrated damage in several corridors.
Tom, a staff member, summarized the damage assessment: approximately 20 buildings were classified as destroyed, about 60 sustained major damage (repair requiring engineering assessment), and roughly 525 structures in Rolla and Phelps County were affected in some way. He said inspectors had already issued 117 electrical permits to restore service lines and five building permits for repairs; two buildings had been demolished and removed. The storm’s maximum width at one point was described as about 175 yards (about 525 feet).
Tom said that a large share of observed damage reflected falling trees striking structures, the time of year (leaf-off) and drier ground conditions, which can influence how trees and structures respond to high winds. He told the commission older buildings appeared to suffer more severe damage than newer construction, and noted that modern building-code requirements for wind connections (roof tie-downs, hurricane clips) and reinforced garage doors can reduce structural collapse pathways.
Staff described the city’s response cycle: initial response and coordination with the emergency operations center, inspections to identify unsafe structures (no/limited occupancy postings), distribution of handouts to residents about recovery and scam awareness, and mapping of damage into the city’s GIS. Tom described recovery as underway and mitigation work to follow, with permitting, inspections and possible code‑driven improvements tied to resiliency planning. He also noted the hazard mitigation plan process and FEMA reporting, including volunteer-hour documentation.
During commission discussion, members praised the scale of volunteer response and community cleanup. Staff recommended considering storm shelters and continuing public preparedness work as next steps.
