Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County staff detail $1 billion infrastructure need over decades; road and bridge mill levy central to plan

3730092 · May 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Development & Transportation officials presented a multi‑decade infrastructure backlog and Transportation Mobility Plan that together approach $1 billion in needs; staff said restoring the full road & bridge mill levy is central to sustainably funding both maintenance and multimodal projects.

Jefferson County Development & Transportation (D&T) told the Board that county infrastructure needs total roughly $1 billion over a 20–30 year horizon if the county wants to both maintain existing assets and build multimodal, pedestrian and bicycle facilities identified in the Transportation Mobility Plan (TMP).

D&T presented two funding paths: continue at current funding levels (partial service), or restore the full authorized road & bridge mill levy to enable a larger maintenance program plus new multimodal projects. "We need approximately $17.8 million more annually devoted just to our maintenance infrastructure program," the D&T presenter said, explaining that restoring the full mill levy would allow a 15‑year resurfacing cycle and materially reduce deferred maintenance.

Key figures and priorities: - D&T estimated roughly $630 million in currently unfunded road projects plus ~ $500 million of new TMP projects (total ~ $1.13 billion). - Under current funding the county resurfaces about 120 lane miles per year; full mill‑levy restoration would let the county reach roughly 200 lane miles per year and reduce lifecycle costs. - Bridge and structure work: D&T maintains 108 bridges and hundreds of minor structures; staff currently budgets around $1.25 million for structures and said critical needs are growing. Restored funding would increase structure funding to about $3.25 million a year, enabling more repairs and replacements.

Staffing and retention: D&T asked for additional field and inspection staff (two engineering inspectors, two construction inspectors, one transportation planner) and said recruitment/retention is a major constraint. "We pay around $21 per hour for a starting road and bridge employee and $25 once they get their CDL," the presenter said, noting neighboring jurisdictions often pay higher wages and offer bonuses that draw recruits away.

One‑time vs ongoing: D&T distinguished maintenance (ongoing) from one‑time capital projects. Road and Bridge is an enterprise fund with statutory restrictions: federal and local rules mean money already in the general fund cannot be moved into Road & Bridge; restoring the authorized mill levy increases Road & Bridge revenue for future years but typically only takes effect for collections the year after a levy change, which can delay project spending until 2027 if the levy is changed in late 2025.

Where 1A dollars fit: Staff identified certain TMP and flood‑related activities that can be eligible for 1A retained revenue if the board determines they fit ballot language; D&T also proposed a $2.5 million 1A request intended for right‑of‑way mitigation and survey work, while acknowledging some of that sum may be reallocated to flood needs.

Commissioner questions and next steps: Commissioners asked D&T to present the equivalent figures for a partial mill‑levy restoration so the board can compare outcomes. Staff agreed to refine the requests into options tied to board direction.

Ending: D&T asked the board to consider mill‑levy restoration as part of a long‑term infrastructure strategy and to provide direction on the mix of retained‑revenue and levy changes the board prefers.