Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Aldermen consider vacating unimproved Estes Court; planning commission recommended approval with conditions

3717387 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Property owners requested vacation of an unimproved right‑of‑way (Estes Court) in the Parkview Terrace subdivision; planning staff and the planning and zoning commission recommended approval subject to recording access and utility easements and combining lots; board held the ordinance for a future meeting.

The Board of Aldermen heard a request from property owners to vacate approximately 400 feet of an unimproved right‑of‑way known as Estes Court in the Parkview Terrace subdivision, south of East Bryant Street. Community Development Director Randall Whitman presented the request and said the street and other public improvements were not constructed after platting; the seven lots adjacent to the right‑of‑way (Lots 11–17A) are owned by a single owner and are unimproved.

Planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the request and recommended approval with two conditions: (1) acquisition and recording of access and utility easements from the Bryant Street lots that front adjacent properties, and (2) administrative replat or subdivision consolidation to combine Lots 11–17A. City staff confirmed required posting and publication requirements were met and reported no public protests had been received.

Why this matters: vacating the platted but unbuilt right‑of‑way would clarify record title and allow the owner to consolidate lots for future development, but easements and a replat are required to preserve public utility access. The board opened the public comment period; no members of the public spoke for or against the vacation during tonight’s hearing.

Outcome: The board held Bill 3650 over to a future meeting for final action after the applicant pursues the required easements and the administrative replat as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

Ending: Staff advised the board it would process the access easements and subdivision consolidation administratively and return the ordinance for final reading after the conditions have been satisfied.