Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation And Trails topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aldermen propose code changes to allow e-bikes, ban ATVs and motor vehicles on multiuse trails
Summary
Council placed on first reading a code amendment to permit certain electric mobility devices on multiuse trails while prohibiting ATVs, golf carts and similar motor vehicles; staff said the change balances accessibility with pedestrian safety.
Get email alerts on the Transportation And Trails topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Aldermen placed on first reading an ordinance (bill 3655) amending Chapter 120 to regulate non-pedestrian traffic on Ozark’s multiuse trails. The proposal would explicitly allow electric bicycles, mobility scooters and electric scooters while prohibiting golf carts, motorized play vehicles, ATVs and other motor vehicles on the trail network.
Hayden Ponser, Ozark parks director, said the change responds to both an increase in e-bike use and safety incidents involving unauthorized motor vehicles on trails. “As recreation changes, ebikes are becoming a critical part of that recreation,” Ponser said. He told the board parks and police staff have had to respond to ATVs, mopeds and other non-bicycle traffic that created safety concerns.
Nut graf: The amendment seeks to align trail rules with accessibility goals (allowing mobility devices), while extending existing prohibitions on larger motor vehicles to the multiuse trail system in order to protect pedestrians and trail users.
The proposed language includes an exemption for emergency vehicles and city vehicles used by staff on official business. Ponser said the ordinance would extend existing municipal restrictions on motorized vehicles that are already applied to streets and make enforcement on trails clearer for staff.
Board action and next steps: Aldermen placed bill 3655 on first reading by title and description only. The item was held for a future meeting for additional review. No public commenters spoke against or for the change during the first-reading public comment period.
Ending: Staff said the proposed code change is intended to encourage accessible recreation while protecting pedestrian safety and ensuring the city can enforce trail rules consistently.

