Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors and sheriff debate school zone signs and camera thresholds as new cameras begin warning period
Summary
After new speed cameras were activated in Orange County school zones, supervisors and the sheriff discussed confusing signage, the 30-day warning period and the legal requirement that cameras issue citations only at 10 mph above posted limits.
Board members and the county sheriff spent a lengthy portion of the meeting discussing school-zone signage and the county’s newly installed speed cameras, focusing on driver warning signs, visibility and legal thresholds for automated citations.
Several supervisors said existing flashing signs were old, poorly placed or physically blocking newer warning devices, creating confusion for drivers. Supervisor Nickel suggested larger advance-warning signage (“a billboard”) so motorists receive clearer notice before entering a reduced-speed school zone.
Sheriff James, who said the county already issues citations and prosecutes violations, told the board a 30-day warning period for the new camera alerts began the previous day and that cameras are expected to start issuing citations on April 24. He explained the state law governing automated cameras bars issuing a citation unless a driver exceeds the posted limit by at least 10 miles per hour (so a 25 mph zone would trigger a camera citation at 35 mph).
Board members and staff discussed differences among school locations: some stretches of road reduce from 55 to 25 mph or from 45 to 25 mph, depending on the segment and VDOT engineering determinations. Supervisors asked county staff to consult with VDOT about sign placement and spacing; County Administrator Ted Voorhees and staff agreed to ask VDOT to review the physical placement of the new signs and the older flashing school-zone signs, and to check whether additional advance-warning signs can be placed in permitted rights-of-way.
Some supervisors cautioned that adding too many or poorly placed flashing lights can distract drivers; others stressed the need for clearer, larger warning signs so drivers do not view camera locations as “sneaky.” Sheriff James said the new signage alone has already reduced speed in some zones and encouraged the county and school system to amplify public outreach to parents and drivers about the cameras and the enforcement start date.
No formal board action was recorded; staff were directed to coordinate with VDOT and the school system to evaluate signage and to report back.
