Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Volunteer Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montgomery County discusses volunteer incentives: tax exemptions, decals and new turnout gear
Summary
County staff raised a package of ideas to support volunteer firefighters and EMS, including using a personal property tax exemption for one vehicle per volunteer, retaining decal programs, and exploring newer turnout gear; towns and students' residency raised implementation questions.
Montgomery County staff and fire chiefs discussed potential incentives for volunteer firefighters and EMS at the commission's March meeting, focusing on vehicle decal programs, a county-level personal property tax exemption and new turnout gear.
Angie (county staff) outlined legal options: "the code of Virginia allows 1 vehicle license... All 3 of us are doing that correctly, the towns and the county." She said the county is exploring a personal property exemption for one vehicle per active volunteer "up to, say, $500, for example," which would be a county tax exemption designed not to conflict with town incentives. She noted the county will verify legal limits, including whether decals or exemptions are limited to one per household.
Speakers said the exemption would be administered using existing active-roster reporting: "when you submit your active roster, it's pretty much every year we have to do that anyway," a chief said. Commissioners gave counts used in planning: "Christiansburg... about 660, and the county has about 40," though Blacksburg's count was not available at the meeting.
Concerns were raised about whether the exemption would help agencies with many student volunteers whose vehicles are registered outside Montgomery County. A chief said, "If the vehicle is not registered in the county, we can't exempt for other counties." Participants noted that a one-time funding approach could be used for equipment purchases while the exemption would be an ongoing county tax policy.
Commissioners and chiefs also discussed turnout and wildland gear: one chief recommended replacing older gear with newer, lower-carcinogen designs (a quoted vendor brand in the transcript) and suggested initial funding could come from one-time money with a replacement cycle to reduce future budget pressure.
No formal county policy was adopted at the meeting; staff said they will verify statutory rules and coordinate with towns and chiefs before presenting an ordinance or budget change to the Board of Supervisors.
