Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Customer Service Tracking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses city plan for 311 service and Tyler ERP to centralize citizen service requests
Summary
Members reviewed a city memo proposing a Tyler enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and a 311 customer-service line to consolidate SeeClickFix and telephone reports; Dave Garrett said 311 aims to help residents who prefer calling over online tools.
Get email alerts on the Customer Service Tracking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Citizen Government Review Committee discussed a city memo noting gaps in follow-up on studies and recommendations and outlining plans to implement a Tyler enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and a 311 customer-service line to consolidate online and phone service requests.
Committee members raised the distinction between SeeClickFix, an online-only reporting tool, and a 311 phone routing system that would allow staff to merge telephone reports with online submissions. One member summarized the difference: SeeClickFix is "online only," while a 311 service is intended to bring online and phone workflows together.
Dave Garrett, director of communications for the city, explained the goal: "The hope with the 311 number is to assist people that may not be tech savvy and would rather just call a number and talk to someone on the phone. So hopefully that clears that. Exactly." Garrett and other staff said the city hopes the Tyler ERP will serve as a single back-end system to track assignments and follow-up across departments, and that SeeClickFix entries and 311 calls would be managed in one public-facing workflow.
Committee members noted it is not yet clear whether the new system would be expanded to track follow-up on policy studies and governing-body requests, which has been a separate concern raised in committee issue papers. Member Brian said the committee could reference the city manager's memo in its follow-up procedures recommendation and ask whether the proposed systems would meet the committee's needs.
No formal decision was made; the committee asked staff to consider whether the proposed toolset could support the follow-up and tracking the committee recommended.

