Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fairview planning commissioners recommend conditional-use permit for LDS temple with limits on height, lighting, sewer and coverage

3654957 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Town of Fairview Planning and Zoning Commission voted April 24 to recommend approval of a conditional-use permit for a proposed 30,742-square-foot Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints temple on Stacy Road, subject to conditions limiting tower height, exterior lighting, sewer connection, lot coverage and drainage.

FAIRVIEW, Texas — The Town of Fairview Planning and Zoning Commission voted April 24 to recommend approval of a conditional-use permit (CUP) for a proposed Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints temple on an 8.1-acre site on the north side of Stacy Road west of Meandering Way, with specific limits on tower height, exterior lighting, sewer connection, impervious coverage and drainage.

Staff presented the application and analysis at the special meeting. Israel, a town planner, described the site plan and said the proposed building totals 30,742 square feet including a partial basement and would be sited behind an ornamental fence with heavy landscape screening. Israel said the project’s lot coverage is about 38.8% — above Fairview’s typical 35% limit for the RE-1 district but below a prior religious-facility approval the town has allowed at 42%.

Town engineer James reviewed utilities, drainage and traffic. James said there is a 16-inch water main on the north side of Stacy Road with capacity for the proposed use but no Town of Fairview sewer to the site; the applicant has discussed connecting to the City of Allen’s sewer system. James also described a detention pond designed to limit peak runoff to the predevelopment rate (two outfalls, combined predeveloped rate shown as 9.8 cubic feet per second) and summarized a traffic study that estimated roughly 869 one-way trips per day from the temple and concluded the site’s existing left-turn lane and local intersections would not meet signal or deceleration warrants based on the study inputs.

Attorney Richard Abernathy, representing the applicant, said the CUP “is consistent with the terms and conditions of a nonbinding mediated settlement agreement that was reached between the town and the church.” Paul McCracken of Kimley-Horn, the applicant’s consultant, told commissioners his team had reviewed staff’s April 24 memorandum and “we do respectfully request approval of the application as it’s been submitted.” Architect Mike Sparkman and other members of the design team answered technical questions about parapet and mechanical screening, tower geometry and finish materials.

More than three dozen residents spoke during the public hearing. Opponents focused on building height, the proposed nighttime lighting, dark-sky protection, traffic and precedent for religious buildings in residential-zoned areas. Supporters — many identifying themselves as members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — said the revised design was substantially smaller than earlier proposals, emphasized the site’s screening and landscaping, and argued that having a temple closer to area members would reduce travel on highways and provide a quiet, landscaped public amenity.

Commissioners said they were generally satisfied that the current design was smaller and more compliant than earlier versions but reported lingering concerns from residents and among themselves about the height of the tower/steeple and the potential for continuous facade lighting. Commissioners and staff discussed technical matters the public had raised, including the absence of town sewer at the site, the applicant’s statement of Allen’s sewer capacity, traffic growth rates used in the study, existing lot-coverage precedent and photometric lighting results submitted by the applicant.

After discussion, commissioners voted to recommend approval of the CUP with conditions. The conditions adopted by the commission, as stated on the record and copied into the permit recommendation, include: - A maximum roof/facade height (parapet) not to exceed 44 feet, 7 inches. - A maximum overall tower and spire height not to exceed 68 feet, 3 inches. - A requirement that the temple connect to the City of Allen sewer system (coordination and service to be secured as part of final permitting). - The project name on approvals and signage to read "Fairview Texas Temple." - Lighting restrictions: all exterior fixtures limited to 3,000 Kelvin color temperature; no fixture that emits light above the horizontal plane; no exterior fixtures taller than 20 feet may operate at night; parking and security lighting to be full cutoff and include directional shields to prevent light trespass beyond the property line; lighting allowed only one hour before scheduled temple services and one hour after the last scheduled service on days the temple operates, and in no case later than 11 p.m.; lights to be off when the temple is closed (applicant materials list the facility as open Tuesday–Saturday and closed Sunday–Monday). - Use of available capacity on the western outfall of the site’s detention pond to limit eastward runoff that would discharge toward adjacent backyard properties (final drainage design to be adjusted accordingly during civil permitting). - Maximum impervious/lot coverage not to exceed the 38.9% shown on the submitted site plan, and a building area not to exceed 30,742 square feet.

The commission chair called for the vote after commissioners and staff read the draft conditions aloud. A voice vote was taken; the chair announced “the ayes have it” and the commission’s recommendation was adopted. The motion on the record named the applicant’s project as “McKinney LDS Temple” but the approved condition requires the use of “Fairview Texas Temple.” The motion did not record a numerical roll-call tally in the transcript; the clerk announced the motion carried and the hearing record was closed.

Next steps: the Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendation will go to the Town Council for final action. If Council approves the CUP with the same conditions, the applicant still must obtain site-plan and building permits, finalize civil engineering (including drainage and sewer connection agreements), and comply with the town’s lighting, landscaping and building codes during permitting. The applicant and several commissioners noted the possibility of additional technical refinements during the permit review process but said they expected those items to be addressed as part of final civil and building plan review.

Why it matters: Commissioners said the case touches on recurring town questions about how Fairview balances residential zoning rules, dark-sky protections and community character against requests from large, well-resourced institutions for exceptions. Supporters said the project will serve area church members and provide a landscaped, low-activity use; opponents warned that approval with generous lighting or height exceptions could set precedent for future institutional projects in residentially zoned areas.