Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission overrides planning board, approves Manhattan Development Code changes including bike‑parking revisions
Summary
The Manhattan City Commission unanimously approved first reading of multiple Manhattan Development Code amendments on May 6, including a new district‑hierarchy provision, adjusted bicycle‑parking requirements and clarifications to sign and administrative procedures, overriding the planning board to adopt the staff‑refined text.
The Manhattan City Commission on May 6 approved first reading of multiple amendments to the Manhattan Development Code (MDC), including a new district‑hierarchy provision (used in rezoning notice/processing), sign‑code clarifications, and edited bicycle‑parking ratios. The commission overrode the Manhattan Urban Area Planning Board’s prior recommendation to adopt the text and approved the version amended by staff, 5‑0.
John Adam, assistant director of community development, said the package is primarily housekeeping and clarifying language but contains a few notable changes: a district‑hierarchy mechanism that lets staff treat an applicant’s post‑notice request for a “lesser” zoning as not requiring renotification under state code; adjustments to bike‑parking ratios after the planning board sought staff to fine‑tune a table; and modest changes to sign allowances in some commercial districts.
Adam explained the bike‑parking revision was driven by recent development proposals that produced an inconsistent result in the code's earlier draft. “We had some development proposals that have come up in the last couple of months…when we looked at the bike parking that they would require, we thought that's really, really a lot of bike parking,” he said, and presented a corrected ratio schedule for commission consideration. Staff also proposed extending neighborhood meeting notice to 14 days to improve public outreach.
Commissioners questioned the treatment of retirement communities in the bike‑parking table and the overall clarity of procedural language; staff said the planning board approved the code package as presented to them but had asked staff to refine the bicycle‑parking approach before it returned to the commission. After additional discussion, the commission voted to override the planning board and approve the amended MDC text.
The roll call approving the override and first reading was unanimous: Commissioners Mitten, Adamczyk, Opelt, Mota and Mayor McCullough — yes. Staff said the changes will take effect after the ordinance completes its required readings and that technical implementation and cross‑references will be finalized before publication.
