Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Shade Structures topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council debates configuration, materials for Rum River Meadows shade structures; defers final design to park board

3654370 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors discussed replacing two shade structures at Rum River Meadows Park after a prior installation had pooling problems; staff and council favored attempting a less expensive permeable or alternate configuration and asked parks staff/board to finalize details.

City councilors discussed options to replace two shade structures at Rum River Meadows Park after a recent installation experienced water pooling because incorrect installation instructions were used.

A councilor noted the initial installation used instructions for a permeable structure though a non‑permeable tarp had been installed, creating insufficient pitch and causing pooling. Council members discussed lower‑cost removable shade fabric systems (20x20 tarps with posts), permanent shade structures at an estimated $25,000 each, and the possibility of planting trees as a long‑term shade strategy.

Council members and staff discussed pros and cons: removable shade fabric is inexpensive and has a five‑year warranty in vendor literature, but some vendors have mixed reviews. One councilor suggested giving the inexpensive option another trial because it costs a fraction of a permanent structure. Another suggested trying permeable tarps to avoid pooling; staff said posts already in the ground might have to be adjusted to accommodate different sizes. The council also discussed colors and whether to let park staff or the parks board choose the final design.

Public Works and parks staff said they can reallocate trees from other city properties and will examine post locations before ordering. The parks board meeting schedule was noted; the council asked staff to present detailed options to the parks board for selection.

No formal purchase or contract was approved during the discussion; councilors directed staff to return with specific recommendations and to consult with the parks board on configuration, materials and site placement.