Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation And Small Area Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission seeks moratorium to study East French Lake Road small-area plan and road alignment
Summary
The Dayton Planning Commission voted unanimously to ask the City Council for a moratorium to study road alignment and land use east of Dayton Parkway, citing unresolved access questions that affect whether the area should grow as industrial or medium-density residential.
The Dayton Planning Commission voted 4-0 to ask the City Council to place a moratorium on new development applications in a swath of land east of Dayton Parkway between County Road 81 and East French Lake Road while staff studies road alignment and land-use implications.
Staff had presented bubble sketches showing alternatives: extend 1st (Hundredth) Thirteenth Avenue east as a divider between industrial to the north and residential to the south, or rely on a road spur shown in prior small-area planning that ties the area to Dayton Parkway and the roundabout. Commissioners debated the highest-and-best use for properties along East French Lake Road and County Road 81, weighing industrial demand, access limitations for semitrailers and protections for adjacent neighborhoods such as Territorial Trail.
A recurring concern: access and road configuration will determine whether larger industrial buildings can be accommodated without routing heavy truck traffic through existing neighborhoods. Commissioners said a straight east-west route across the large parcels would better serve industrial users and reduce circuitous truck movements; others argued that the East side of East French Lake Road should remain medium-density residential with a strong buffer to adjacent single-family neighborhoods.
Staff noted an existing figure in the city’s small-area plan (figure 16) that identifies an east–west connector; several commissioners said they had not realized that map remained an adopted planning document and asked staff to confirm whether that alignment still governs decisions. Staff recommended contacting current applicants (including Oppidan, the concept applicant discussed) and advising them that study and potential plan changes could affect approvals.
Commissioner Paul moved a recommendation to council for a moratorium on new development applications in the study area and a planning study to refine alignment and land use; Commissioner Darren seconded. The motion passed, 4-0. Staff said the moratorium would require a public hearing before council, that paperwork and public-notice lead times suggest the council hearing would likely occur within about three weeks, and staff expected the study and public process to take a short number of months.
Commissioners asked staff to define the moratorium area to include the DDL/Oppidan property and the parcels between 1 Seventeenth, County Road 81, and East French Lake Road — excluding developed Territorial Trails — and to return with refined maps and options for alignment, including a straight-across 1 Thirteenth alignment and alternative north–south connectors.
The commission’s action does not itself change zoning; it pauses new applications in the delineated area while the city updates the small-area plan and evaluates roadway and access solutions to guide long-term land use.
