Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Auburn presents revised budget outlook; officials propose limited rate changes and $500,000 fund‑balance use
Summary
City staff presented a revised preliminary budget showing a reduced gap from earlier estimates and proposed a $500,000 use of fund balance, a recommended 2% sewer rate increase and no water‑rate increase pending a wholesale rate study. Solid waste, energy costs and a pending tipping‑fee bid remain budget uncertainties.
City staff presented the city’s updated preliminary budget to the Auburn City Council on May 8, outlining smaller-than‑initial gaps after revenue and expenditure adjustments and proposing limited use of reserves while asking departments to seek additional savings.
Budget director (presenter identified in the meeting as Miss Leeson) described the multi‑week process and listed key figures: an initial budget gap of about $8.54 million was narrowed to roughly $2.8 million through revenue adjustments and departmental expenditure reductions. Leeson recommended using $500,000 of fund balance and continuing other measures to close the remaining gap, pending the final New York State budget and retirement incentive results.
Why it matters: The budget choices will affect tax levy decisions, utility rates and capital projects. Leeson told council members that energy costs (gas +22%, electric +19%), health insurance (+19%) and liability insurance (+10%) were significant drivers of the budget shortfall. Staff identified additional revenue from administrative charges, interfund repayments and departmental billing adjustments.
Key proposals and details from the presentation: Leeson and staff recommended no water‑rate increase at this time while proposing a 2% sewer‑rate increase (city staff estimated the 2% sewer increase would change the minimum user charge by only a few cents per quarter). For solid waste, staff said the city is licensed for 12,500 tons but handled 10,165 tons in 2024; the private‑hauler rate cited in discussion was $80 per ton and staff said they will reexamine commercial billing and tipping‑fee assumptions once pending bids are opened. Leeson said staff aims to maintain fund balances within policy levels and to avoid excessive one‑time draws.
Councilors asked for additional detail on impacts to minimum users and on repayment of general‑fund advances tied to the landfill operation; Leeson said staff will follow up. Council discussion also praised staff for the work to reduce the shortfall and noted state budget items that may provide relief, including temporary AIM funding and the potential to make some items permanent.
No council vote was taken; this was a staff presentation and continuing budget work session with next steps to re‑evaluate after state budget outcomes and the completion of the retirement‑incentive deadline.
