Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Foreign Influence topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate rejects bill to bar paid lobbying on behalf of certain foreign entities after extended debate

3629139 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate voted down House Bill 16‑62, which would have restricted paid lobbying for covered foreign entities (with debate focused on China); final vote: 16 yeas, 14 nays, 5 not voting — motion failed.

After extended floor debate the Senate failed to pass House Bill 16‑62, a measure that would have prohibited lobbying for covered foreign entities. Sponsors described the measure as targeting influence paid for by foreign adversaries; opponents said the bill raised free‑speech concerns and risked chilling paid advocacy by people with lawful business ties.

Senator Blake Johnson, sponsor on the floor, cited federal registration statutes and said groups funded or controlled by foreign governments should register and not be permitted to pay Arkansas lobbyists. “If these groups aren't registered with the attorney general of The United States, they're in violation,” he said, arguing the measure protects state sovereignty.

Several senators argued the bill would curtail constitutionally protected speech or unfairly single out citizens of particular countries. Senator Clark said the bill could disadvantage poor or middle‑class people who rely on paid representation and called it a free‑speech issue. Other senators said the bill was needed to stem influence by states that act against U.S. interests.

The Senate recorded a roll call that resulted in 16 yeas, 14 nays and 5 not voting; the bill failed. A later procedural motion for a clincher vote also failed. Sponsors said the debate reflected deep concerns about foreign influence but that legislators were split over whether a statutory prohibition was the right tool.