Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Influence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Measure to bar paid lobbying for certain foreign entities fails after constitutional objections
Summary
A Senate bill that would have barred Arkansans from lobbying on behalf of specified foreign-controlled entities failed after floor debate focused on First Amendment and federal preemption concerns; the vote was later expunged and then the Senate took a procedural action to clear the record.
A proposal to prohibit paid lobbying in Arkansas on behalf of certain foreign-controlled entities drew extended debate on the Senate floor and failed a recorded vote after members raised constitutional and practical objections.
Senator Blake Johnson, sponsor of House Bill 16 62 on the Senate floor, framed the measure as a national-security and economic-protection step. “This bill prohibits our enemies from lobbying the state of Arkansas and our local entities and having undue influence into the procedures and and enriching themselves,” he said on the floor, urging colleagues to prevent paid lobbyists representing adversarial foreign interests from influencing state policy.
Opponents raised constitutional concerns. Senator Tucker, speaking against the bill, said: “My concerns with the bill are all constitutional ... this bill is actually regulating the free speech of Arkansans,” adding that the text risked infringing First Amendment protections and encroaching on federal authority over foreign affairs. Senator Sullivan also opposed the bill, saying it “penalizes Arkansans, and violates the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech for Arkansas residents and U.S. citizens.” Other senators warned the draft language was vague and could sweep in legitimate businesses operating in Arkansas.
After floor debate and recorded voting, the Senate recorded a vote of 16 yeas, 14 nays, 3 not voting and 2 present on HB 16 62; the presiding officer announced that the bill failed. Members later moved to expunge the failed vote from the record; the motion to expunge carried by voice vote, clearing the formal roll-call outcome from the journal but not erasing the floor debate.
Why it matters: The bill would have restricted whom paid lobbyists and agents may represent in contacts with Arkansas lawmakers, focusing on entities controlled by listed foreign governments. Supporters described the measure as defending state policymaking from foreign influence; critics said it risked unconstitutional restrictions on speech, commercial activity and interstate commerce and could conflict with federal authority on foreign affairs.
What happens next: With the failed vote recorded and later expunged, the proposal does not advance. Sponsors and interested parties may refile a narrower measure, pursue registration or disclosure requirements for foreign-affiliated principals, or seek federal guidance on how to limit influence without running afoul of constitutional protections.
Vote and process notes: The Senate roll-call was recorded as 16–14 (plus not voting/present counts) and the presiding officer declared the measure failed; the Senate later voted to expunge that roll-call from the journal.
