Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Applicant withdraws 54 Lawrence Street conversion request after ZBA cites footnote 8 prohibition

May 14, 2025 | Framingham City, Middlesex County, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Applicant withdraws 54 Lawrence Street conversion request after ZBA cites footnote 8 prohibition
An applicant seeking permission to convert a single-family house at 54 Lawrence Street into a two-family dwelling withdrew his application without prejudice on May 14 after extended legal discussion about a zoning footnote that the board said prohibits such conversions on nonconforming lots.

Nicholas (referred to in the hearing as Nicholas Micheli) argued that his project complied with lot-coverage limits and other dimensional regulations and that state law (Chapter 40A, Section 6) and several court decisions gave the board discretion to approve alterations to preexisting nonconforming structures. He presented satellite images and notarized neighbor support showing that most houses on Lawrence Street already are two- or three-family buildings.

Board members and the ZBA’s legal advisors focused on “footnote 8,” a local zoning table footnote the board read as an explicit prohibition against granting a special permit for conversion from single-family to two-family where the lot or structure is nonconforming. Multiple board members said the footnote prevents them from approving this special-permit conversion regardless of the applicant’s arguments about lot coverage or neighborhood character. The applicant said he is pursuing a legislative remedy and had raised the issue with the Planning Board; one city councilor in attendance, Lior Malek, said council members are discussing possible zoning changes.

After the board discussed options — including redesign to seek a variance under Section 10 or awaiting a bylaw amendment — the applicant moved to withdraw the petition without prejudice. The board approved that withdrawal; the applicant may refile if the bylaw changes or substantial new evidence emerges. No roll-call vote on the withdrawal was recorded in the transcript.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI