Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears local advocates on REST Act and rent‑stabilization authority
Summary
Advocates and legal experts spoke during the May 12 informal session about the proposed state REST Act, which would allow municipalities to choose whether to adopt rent stabilization and to tailor eligibility criteria. Supporters said the bill returns decision‑making authority to cities and gives tools to limit tenant displacements.
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members heard proponents of the REST Act at the May 12 informal meeting, which the speakers described as state legislation that would give municipalities more power to adopt rent stabilization and to tailor rules to local housing markets.
"What the REST Act does is put the power in the hands of municipalities to decide whether this policy makes sense for them and then tailor it to meet their needs," said Naomi Dan, with County Justice for All, who spoke during the public presentation.
Advocates told the council the existing state framework limits local options by applying rent stabilization only to older buildings and by defining eligibility largely by building size and construction date. The REST Act would allow cities to consider local housing stock and potentially cover additional building types if the municipality decides that is appropriate, they said.
Speakers acknowledged concerns raised by homeowners and small landlords about timing, market impact and enforcement, and they encouraged councilors to engage state legislators with suggested amendments. The public comment record at the meeting included questions about how rent stabilization would interact with existing local and state protections and whether annual rent adjustments and vacancy rules would be applied.
Council members did not adopt a formal position during the informal session; several asked clarifying questions and said they would take the community feedback into account as the bill advances in the state Legislature.

