Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff previews amendment to plan development for property at Honor Lane seeking Office 1 use
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission on April 21 heard a staff preview of a requested amendment to the plan development for a property described in the transcript as "12:52 Honor Lane," where the community-center requirement and the original veteran-focused purpose of the development have changed hands.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning and Zoning Commission on April 21 heard a staff preview of a requested amendment to the plan development for a property described in the transcript as "12:52 Honor Lane," where the community-center requirement and the original veteran-focused purpose of the development have changed hands.
"This is to amend the plan development for what was originally a veteran community," Planning and Development Director Brian Chandler said. He said Habitat for Humanity were the original owners, and that "the community center ... is required in the plan development to be a community center. Well, it's been purchased by another, property owner, and I believe the owner is here to be able to answer questions."
Chandler said many of the attached single-family homes in the development were sold to nonveterans, which has left the community-center requirement difficult to meet under the original plan. "Maybe the intent was for this to be a veterans community, but I think a lot of those, homes attached single family homes were sold to non veterans," he said. To make the parcel "economically viable," staff has worked with the applicant to propose Office 1 as an allowable use rather than retail or neighborhood service uses. Chandler described Office 1 as "certainly appropriate for that location ... in terms of parking, you know, compatibility with the neighborhood."
The transcript contains no formal motion, vote, or final decision on the Honor Lane amendment. The owner who purchased the community center was mentioned but not named in the recorded remarks. Staff said they expect "a healthy discussion" on the item when it reaches the regular agenda; details such as any proposed changes to parking counts, specific operating conditions, or a hearing date were not provided in the work session remarks.

