Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners express concern over Senate Bill 117 and ask staff to clarify Department of Revenue review options
Summary
Treasure County commissioners discussed Senate Bill 117's complex property-tax changes and the practical effect on small counties. They asked staff to confirm whether to request a four-year review by the Department of Revenue and to clarify procedures and potential financial impacts.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners spent a lengthy portion of the April 1 meeting reviewing provisions of Senate Bill 117 and the county's options for requesting a four-year review by the Montana Department of Revenue.
Staff and commissioners described SB 117 as a complicated property-tax measure that reallocates some new-construction tax revenue to a state-managed fund and authorizes a state share to be withheld to backfill losses from large taxpayers. Commissioners said the bill 'as written would be particularly difficult for small counties that rely heavily on centrally assessed valuations (railroads, large utilities), and they raised concerns about the bill's administrative complexity and software costs charged to counties.
Relatedly, the board reviewed whether to authorize a four-year lookback review by the Department of Revenue on newly discovered taxable property (a reconciliation step county staff sometimes uses to capture missed assessments). Staff said the county had discussed previously leaving the review in place only on an exception basis and pointed to ambiguities about whether the county should instruct the department to go back four years in all cases.
What happened next: commissioners directed staff to draft a clear written motion or resolution that specifies the board's desired handling of four-year Department of Revenue reviews and to circulate that language to the tax assessor (Deb) for confirmation. Commissioners asked staff to confirm the legal and administrative implications before the board takes final action.
Why it matters: the changes under SB 117 and the relationship with centrally assessed valuation and Department of Revenue processes could materially affect county budgeting and the timing of revenue flows. Commissioners said they do not want to cede unresolved authority to the state and asked staff to return with exact wording for a formal decision.
