Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

EDA reports March quarter net position of $20.7 million; land sales and transfers drove operating loss

3548812 · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City finance staff presented the EDA’s quarterly financial statements through March 31: total assets about $23 million, net position $20.7 million (a $550,000 decrease year over year), an operating loss for the quarter largely driven by land transactions, and unpaid grant commitments of $243,000.

At the April 15 meeting, finance staff presented the Economic Development Authority’s third-quarter financial statements through March 31.

The presenter reported total reported assets of about $23 million, including roughly $7.3 million in cash, $1.9 million in accounts receivable, land held at $1.2 million and property held for sale at $12.7 million. Liabilities were reported at about $546,000, leaving a net position of $20.7 million, a decrease of approximately $550,000 from the prior year.

Staff explained the quarter’s operating results showed an operating loss of about $590,000 that was driven primarily by land dispositions recorded at a loss. Operating expenses for the quarter totaled about $3.23 million, and grants paid year to date were about $339,000. The authority recorded $120,000 in interest income, a land contribution from the city valued at approximately $609,000, fees associated with land transfer of $89,000, and a quarterly transfer to the city of $31,000.

The presenter noted outstanding commitments: approved grants totaling approximately $243,000 that had not yet been disbursed. Staff also reviewed year-to-date budget vs. actuals and explained that several budget line items are carryovers into FY26, which can make bottom-line numbers look misleading if not interpreted alongside carried-forward appropriations.

No formal action was required; the report was presented for information and follow-up questions.