Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Space Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City presents Point Lumley Park concept; public urges burying utility lines and careful pump‑station review

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City designers presented a concept for Point Lumley Park as part of the waterfront flood‑mitigation project. The BAR treated the presentation as a concept review; the public largely supported the plan but urged burial of utility poles, careful placement of a pump station and attention to public safety at the wharf.

City staff and the waterfront project team presented a concept design for Point Lumley Park on the Alexandria waterfront during Monday’s Board of Architectural Review meeting, describing a rectilinear park framework, a signature wharf, floating wetlands and a promenade that continues the material palette of nearby Robinson Landing.

The presentation, delivered by Sarah Sapolvaris (deputy project manager for the city’s waterfront implementation project) and Meredith Berry (senior landscape architect, Lee and Associates), summarized design goals: flood‑mitigation infrastructure, shoreline resilience, materials continuity and new public programming. The project team emphasized the Olin common elements and the Waterfront Small Area Plan as the basis for materials and layout.

Public speakers generally welcomed the plan as a realization of the Olin waterfront vision. Yvonne Wake Callahan of the Old Town Civic Association said the work “vindicates” the Olin plan. Al Cox, a resident who led fundraising for the shipbuilder statue, urged the board and city to raise nearby park and sidewalk grades “as much as possible to limit the amount of water that will need to be pumped,” and reminded the team to consult the sculpture’s artist if the statue is relocated.

The most frequently repeated public request was for the city to bury existing overhead utility lines that cross Strand and the park frontage. Norman Leiter and other residents called those poles “an eyesore” and urged the city to pay the cost if necessary. Several speakers also raised safety concerns about proposed wood benching at the wharf edge and suggested design measures to reduce the risk of falls into the water.

Designers described key elements: a 22‑foot wide hard‑scape “shipbuilding” arrival walk designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; a diagonal wharf intended as a visual focus and destination with timber seating and steps down to the water; floating wetlands and a possible kayak launch; a permeable promenade sloped slightly toward the park to contain runoff; and bioretention areas that could incorporate historic canal stones excavated earlier from the Alexandria Canal. Sapolvaris noted that the pump station proposal in Waterfront Park is out of scope for this presentation and will be presented to the BAR in a separate June hearing.

Board members praised the thoroughness of the concept and requested follow‑up studies and clarifications: feasibility and cost estimates for burying the utility lines; further exploration of wharf bench safety and guardrail alternatives; confirmation of promenade grades and accessibility; and coordination on shipbuilder statue relocation and artist consultation.

Outcome: Concept review only — the BAR did not vote on a certificate of appropriateness. Staff and the design‑build team will continue to refine the plans, study burial of utility lines, confirm final locations for the floating wetlands and kayak launch, and return to the BAR with further materials including the scheduled pump‑station presentation.