Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board debates 96-square-foot cap versus percentage-of-facade rule for signage; staff to draft alternatives
Summary
Members of the Danville Board of Adjustments discussed inconsistencies in the zoning ordinance's sign standards—specifically a 96-square-foot cap and a percentage-of-facade rule—and asked planning staff to draft language options for the planning commission and the board to consider.
The Danville Board of Adjustments spent an extended portion of new business discussing an apparent inconsistency in the joint planning and zoning ordinance sign standards: whether a 96-square-foot cap or a percentage-of-facade measurement should control allowed wall sign sizes.
Board members and staff agreed the ordinance language has produced inconsistent application: in some past cases the 96-square-foot figure was treated as a maximum regardless of facade size, while in other cases the board applied a percentage-of-facade…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
