Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Mountain Lake Drive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission postpones Mountain Lake Drive rezoning after safety, roads and floodplain concerns
Summary
A developer’s request to rezone and develop parcels along Mountain Lake Drive in the Mount Plymouth area was postponed when commissioners raised questions about septic systems, unimproved roads, floodplain impacts and platting; staff will re-advertise and return when the applicant can appear in person.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Mountain Lake Drive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lake County Board of County Commissioners voted to postpone action on a rezoning application for property along Mountain Lake Drive in the Mount Plymouth area after commissioners and staff raised multiple unresolved issues including road standards, floodplain encroachment, septic feasibility and lot configuration.
Planning staff had described a concept plan for roughly 19 lots with lots ranging from about 13,600 to 24,500 square feet. The property is mapped with some floodplain encroachment and wetlands appear adjacent to—but not on—the subject parcel, according to GIS overlays staff displayed. Public Works told the board that Mountain Lake Drive is platted but unimproved in portions, and Public Works’ engineering director, Jeff Earhart, said the department views the access as requiring subdivision-level improvements and paving to county standards rather than an unpaved private road.
Commissioners expressed concern about allowing gravel or unimproved roads for new subdivisions when county standards require improved paved roads; staff responded that the developer would have to obtain permits from St. Johns River Water Management District for drainage and show compliance with finished-floor elevations for houses in flood-prone areas. Staff also reported the applicant has cleared trees in the area and may have outstanding code-enforcement items.
Given the number of unresolved technical questions and the applicant’s absence from the meeting, a motion to postpone until the applicant can appear in person passed on a recorded vote. Staff said the item will be re‑advertised because the postponement was not to a date certain.
Public-works staff indicated the road and drainage will require review and permitting, the county will need to confirm whether septic systems comply with state and county rules, and any fill or grading within floodplain areas will require compensatory measures under FEMA rules. The board directed staff to return when the applicant can attend and provide detailed answers about road construction, drainage, septic design and lot-by-lot buildability.
