Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Albany planning board backs favorable recommendation to city council on accessory dwelling unit zoning change
Summary
Planning board voted to recommend a zoning text amendment to permit accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in most single‑family zoning districts, with size, owner‑occupancy and fire‑safety limits included in the draft ordinance.
The Albany City Planning Board voted to issue a favorable recommendation to the Common Council on a zoning‑text amendment that would permit accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, as an accessory use to single‑family detached dwellings in most city zoning districts.
The recommendation, moved by Chair Chris Ellis and seconded from the floor, passed by voice vote after staff presented the draft ordinance and data the proposal relies on, including census trends and regional ADU programs.
The amendment would add ADUs to the Unified Sustainable Development Ordinance as an accessory use in all zoning districts except the industrial (I‑1 and I‑2) and land conservation districts. Key limits in the draft: only one ADU per lot; a maximum ADU gross floor area of 800 square feet; owner‑occupancy of either the primary or accessory unit; a prohibition on short‑term rentals for ADUs; and dimensional controls on height, setbacks and lot coverage. Staff said the Fire Department requested a 50‑foot maximum straight‑line distance from the street frontage to the rear wall of a detached ADU to preserve emergency access.
Presenters framed ADUs as a tool to increase housing options for seniors, reduce per‑unit energy and water use, and enable modest additional household income for homeowners. Staff cited state‑level incentives including the statewide Plus1 ADU program and a county proposal for a real property tax exemption for ADU construction or conversion; staff also referenced guidance from AARP and recent municipal ADU ordinances in nearby cities.
Board members and speakers raised enforcement and equity questions. A common‑councilor who spoke during public comment urged delay, citing enforcement limits (for example, limits on verifying owner‑occupancy), parking and neighborhood character concerns, and potential misuse of ADUs for short‑term rentals. Board members asked how the code would treat attached versus detached single‑family units and townhouses; staff confirmed the draft restricts ADUs to detached single‑family dwellings and said townhouses would need to use existing two‑ or three‑unit provisions or seek conditional permits. Staff said permit approval would rely on building‑department permits and that owner‑occupancy compliance is typically complaint‑driven in other municipalities.
The planning board’s recommendation is advisory; the Common Council will consider the text amendment and any county/state opt‑in for tax incentives.
Board action: the planning board voted to forward a favorable recommendation to the Common Council on the zoning text amendment (B‑75‑50520 / total tax movement 0023).
