Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rowlett council refines downtown design priorities; staff to produce two design packages for public input
Summary
Director Brittany Farr presented council feedback on downtown branding, lighting, seating, shading and monumentation. Council favored a consistent Rowlett brand with a downtown variant, zig-zag lighting with close spacing, a light-wood/recycled-plastic bench style, and arched, unlit entry monuments; staff will return with two design-development
Brittany Farr, Rowletts Director of Economic and Community Engagement, led a March 31 work session briefing on downtown strategic‑plan implementation and design choices. Farr and senior staff summarized council feedback from a prior ranking exercise and asked council to refine preferences so staff can commission design‑development packages for public review.
Council voiced a preference for consistency with the citys existing Rowlett identity while allowing a downtown variant. Several council members preferred a simple variant that incorporated a downtown identifier (for example by adding “Downtown” in a complementary font or a badge treatment that references the water tower), but the strongest direction was toward a single, consistent citywide logo with a downtown treatment rather than an entirely separate brand.
On lighting, council favored the zig‑zag arrangement shown to the group and chose tighter bulb spacing (approximately 1 foot) to achieve a showier, flexible appearance; staff noted color‑changing LED options and the ability to dim bulbs to address brightness concerns. For seating, the council generally favored a light‑colored, recycled‑plastic or light‑wood look with arms on the ends (curved or straight to be refined by designers). Opinions varied on curved versus straight bench back shapes; staff said the choice is context‑sensitive and will be resolved in design work.
Shading feedback favored a minimalist approach that provides real shade over seating; council split between cloth sail styles and lower‑profile wood/metal canopies. Staff reported the combined preference may be satisfied by a hybrid design that marries minimalist structural supports with more substantial shade coverage and materials chosen for durability in the local climate.
On entry monumentation and wayfinding, council favored arched monuments with flat (non‑backlit) lettering and modest embellishments (vertical bars or small pedestals) that relate to other downtown materials. Several council members expressed concern that fully backlit acrylic signage can look like commercial fairground signage and preferred low‑profile uplighting or landscape illumination rather than internally lit panels.
Farr said staff will ask a consultant to produce two complete design development packages that incorporate council direction and present those packages to the public via online polling, QR code surveys and in‑person open houses. Staff estimated the public input period and consultant work would allow the council to see final recommendations by late summer.
Ending: Staff will finalize a consultant scope based on council feedback, produce two integrated design packages showing the design elements in context along the citys Main Street corridor, run a public input period and return to council with results and recommendations later this summer.
