Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Procedural Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Asbury Park Zoning Board approves resolution for 1206 Comstock St., carries 614 Fifth Ave. to March 11

3537168 · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Feb. 11 meeting the City of Asbury Park Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a resolution related to 1206 Comstock Street, agreed to carry the 614 Fifth Avenue application to March 11, 2025 at the applicant’s request, and then adjourned.

The City of Asbury Park Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a resolution for 1206 Comstock Street and carried the 614 Fifth Avenue application to March 11, 2025, during a brief meeting on Feb. 11, 2025.

Both actions were approved by the four board members present: Jill Potter, Tim Slick, Vice Chair Scully and Chairman Abeloni; five members were recorded as absent. The board then moved to adjourn.

A motion to adopt the resolution for 1206 Comstock Street was made and seconded; the board recorded affirmative votes from Potter, Slick, Scully and Abeloni. The transcript records the vote by calling each member’s name and receiving “yes” responses.

The board also approved a motion to carry the application for 614 Fifth Avenue to the March 11, 2025 meeting “without further notice.” The transcript records that the request to carry the item was submitted by the applicant, identified as Mr. Karas. The board recorded the same recorded yes votes on that motion.

After completing those housekeeping items the board unanimously moved to adjourn. The meeting opening notes that the session was held in compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act, Chapter 231, Public Law 1975, and that the meeting was recorded by APTV and that notices were posted on the municipal bulletin board and municipal website.

The meeting had limited discussion beyond the procedural motions; no substantive debate or public testimony on either property is recorded in the provided transcript.