Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to review tree code after Environmental Commission raises landmark-tree concerns
Summary
Councilmember Dr. O'Connor asked staff to revisit the borough's tree code and landmark-tree designation process, citing concerns that owners' consent is limiting protections; staff will meet and return recommendations.
Councilmember Dr. O'Connor told the Feb. 18 meeting that the Environmental Commission reported inconsistencies in how landmark trees are being designated and protected under the boroughs tree code.
Dr. O'Connor asked staff to work with commission members and municipal staff to clarify the landmark-tree criteria and enforcement so trees that meet age and circumference thresholds receive intended protections. "The way that they're receiving the status is, kind of a bit lax compared to what was designed," she said, and urged staff to review the ordinance language on landmark trees.
Staff members present said they would meet with the Environmental Commission and property-inspection staff to determine whether the ordinance is being applied as intended. Administrator David and staff member Mike Cassidy were identified as likely participants in the review; council staff said they would return with recommendations.
Council members noted the original intent of the landmark-tree provisions was to protect mature trees and root systems from removal that could cause neighborhood drainage or flooding problems, and that designation should be based on measurable criteria (age, circumference, species) rather than only on homeowner consent.
No ordinance amendments were adopted at the meeting; the council asked staff and the commission to draft proposed revisions for future consideration.
