Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears public concerns about RV screening, driveway materials and parking rules; no policy vote
Summary
Public commenters and councilors discussed enforcement and potential flexibility in driveway materials, RV screening and parking rules. Staff said the city code requires "durable, dustless" driveway material but allows other materials if approved; no vote was taken.
Residents at the April 1 meeting raised concerns about code enforcement for parked recreational vehicles, driveway materials and where residents may legally park trailers and RVs.
Public commenter John Schmoll said codes have become difficult to apply and singled out rules that require screening around RVs parked beyond the front yard. "You have to put a screen around an RV...You gotta put up a screen around it that's 6 feet high," Schmoll said, adding that the screening requirement and some code provisions give enforcement officers headaches.
During the public-discussion period an Eagle Scout candidate, Tyler Shaw, asked the council for a debate topic on an issue facing the city; councilors and residents used the opportunity to discuss driveway materials such as "class 5" gravel and recycled millings (often called "regrind"). Council members and residents offered practical concerns: class 5 was described by supporters as a low-cost, do-it-yourself option; opponents raised the risk that snow throwers could scatter rocks and damage neighboring property.
City staff explained the current code standard for driveways: it requires a "durable, dustless material" and lists preapproved materials including concrete, asphalt and pavers. Staff said the code also allows other materials if the property owner shows the material is durable and does not create dust; such materials would require approval by zoning staff. Staff noted that a curb cut is typically required to convert a grass area into a permitted driveway and said staff would defer specific dust definitions to zoning staff when applicants ask for approval.
No formal change to city code or a council vote occurred during the meeting. Councilors asked for additional discussion and suggested the possibility of a demonstration comparing class 5 and recycled millings; one councilor said the council could consider separate standards for temporary trailer parking versus full driveways.
The exchange underscores continuing tension between enforcing existing driveway and parking rules and finding affordable driveway options for residents. Councilors and staff explicitly positioned the matter as one for future consideration rather than immediate rule change.
