Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Projects Assignments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parks commission narrows 2025 project list; members assigned to draft CIP entries
Summary
The Parks & Recreation Commission agreed to a set of lower‑cost, near‑term projects to propose for 2025 funding and divided responsibility for writing the required CIP templates among commissioners.
Get email alerts on the Parks Projects Assignments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The North St. Paul Parks & Recreation Commission singled out a set of smaller, near‑term projects to move into the city’s 2025 CIP consideration and divided writing responsibilities among commissioners.
During the meeting commissioners discussed dozens of items in the 10‑year plan and then focused on lower‑cost projects the group said could be completed or advanced quickly. Commissioners agreed to prepare CIP template submissions for the following near‑term items: removal of a back‑lot shelter and adjacent fencing at Casey Lake Park (to convert the area to a flexible green space), a “ninja”/obstacle course and field reutilization at Casey, two portable Gaga pits (Halsey and Northwood or Tower as feasible), a spider‑style climber and a small “orbiter” spinner at Colby Hills, and a modest nature‑play package for the Urban Ecology site budgeted at roughly $20,000–$25,000.
Commissioners and staff also discussed larger projects on the HGA master‑plan list, notably McKnight Fields. Staff told commissioners that a single large build at McKnight — figures discussed during the meeting included a multi‑million‑dollar total — is unlikely to be affordable within current financial plans and encouraged breaking McKnight into phased components. Commissioners specifically agreed to treat the McKnight parking lot separately; a proposal to keep the parking‑lot cost out of the parks‑fund ask was accepted for now and staff said public works would look at whether resurfacing would be paid from streets/facilities funds rather than the park fund.
Commissioners divided responsibilities for drafting the CIP project entries and supporting materials, and set a near‑term schedule to meet staff deadlines. At the end of the conversation commissioners recorded the assignments: Rachel Lucas will draft entries for Casey Lake, Northwood and Tower; Sarah Zratka will prepare the Urban Ecology write‑up and coordinate McKnight materials; another commissioner will draft Colby Hills materials; David Andren (and others) agreed to draft the Third Street/downtown project entries and Ingrid Kohler will prepare housing‑site related submissions. Staff said they would accept the entries, schedule sponsor meetings with public works, and package recommendations for city council approval.
Commissioners also pressed staff about technical requirements that affect costs: accessible playground surfacing and ADA compliance would increase the price of any large play‑area replacement, shipment and tariffs for imported playground components can change estimates significantly, and site‑specific costs (freight, installation, site prep) still need public works input. Staff encouraged conservative cost estimates for long‑range years and said the financial model is sensitive to assumptions about local government aid and debt/service capacity.
Next steps: commissioners will complete CIP templates and supporting materials in the mid‑May submission window; staff will review feasibility with public works and recommend a funding path to city council.

