Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rail Safety Signal Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff brief council on Otter Tail Valley Railroad signal replacement; concerns raised about parking loss
Summary
Grant Cooper presented plans to replace signals at four downtown rail crossings. The project would add gate arms and roadway adjustments that could remove on‑street parking (24 spaces on Summit, 12 on Mill). Council asked staff to minimize parking loss and return with revised plans before authorizing bid advertisement.
City staff presented an update and asked for authorization to advertise bids to replace signals at four Otter Tail Valley Railroad crossings in downtown Fergus Falls, but council members requested revisions to reduce parking impacts before moving forward.
Grant Cooper summarized public engagement and technical details of the signal‑replacement plan. Staff held a public input meeting on March 28; two residents attended and raised general questions. Cooper explained that making the crossings a no‑horn “quiet zone” would require safety enhancements at every crossing within roughly a half‑mile radius, such as four‑quadrant gate arms or medians; estimated enhancement costs can range widely, roughly $50,000–$300,000 per crossing at a high level. Cooper said MnDOT will not fund quiet‑zone enhancements and that any quiet‑zone work would be the city’s expense.
Cooper reported estimated on‑street parking impacts under the proposed layouts: Summit Avenue would lose 24 parking spaces, Mill Street 12 spaces, and Cascade and Freiburg minimal losses. Several council members urged staff to revise the designs to preserve as many spaces as possible. “I think losing 24 spots on Summit is too many,” one council member said; Cooper replied staff would explore curb realignment and other changes to minimize parking loss and try to push curb changes to the east side where feasible.
The public‑works and MnDOT coordination issues discussed included curb bump‑outs to accommodate gate‑arm counterweights (required minimum set‑back from the sidewalk and road) and the need to narrow roadways in some segments to meet those equipment clearances. Cooper said narrowing is necessary in order to provide the required gate‑arm clearances and minimize risk from gate‑arm counterweights extending into travel lanes.
Council members noted parking demand from churches and businesses near the crossings and asked staff to produce revised drawings showing smaller parking losses. Cooper said staff would return with updated plans and noted that revisions would delay the bidding schedule somewhat; council members indicated that a short delay was acceptable provided the project remains constructible this summer.
No formal authorization to advertise bids was granted at the Committee of the Whole; staff agreed to return with revised plans minimizing parking loss before the Council considers bidding authorization.
