Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Resilience topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Depoe Bay committee backs forming green-energy advisory task force, hears hydrogen microgeneration grant plan
Summary
The Depoe Bay Emergency Preparedness Committee voted to formalize the Green Energy group as a city advisory task force and heard a consultant and an industry analyst outline a two‑phase grant and plans to install hydrogen fuel‑cell microgeneration to provide up to 30 days of backup power for critical facilities.
The Depoe Bay Emergency Preparedness Committee on April 14 voted to move the volunteer Green Energy group toward formal status as an advisory task force to the City Council and heard detailed presentations about a two‑phase state grant and plans to site hydrogen fuel‑cell microgeneration for critical facilities.
Committee member Kimberly said the change of status is a response to public perception and to make it clear “if they’re going to be doing work for and on behalf of the city, they need to be a group of the city.” The committee voted in favor of forming the task force after a motion and second were offered and a voice vote showed support.
Why it matters: committee members and outside advisers said the group’s work has moved beyond short‑term emergency response to longer‑term resilience planning — including proposals to equip the city’s command post and other critical sites with microgeneration that can supply electricity during extended outages.
A senior analyst from the Smart Electric Power Alliance told the committee the funding plan under discussion is “a 2 phase grant. The first phase is up to a hundred k for energy development, resiliency, information gathering, due diligence to see the feasibility of this site and other sites.” That first phase is intended to cover feasibility and design work, the analyst said.
Scott Webb, Assistant Director (city staff), described the technical approach and next steps: “the first grant was designed… an energy backup with a 30 day energy supply” and the design contract was structured so the design could be reused at other sites. Webb said proposed installations would be roughly the size of “a 20‑foot container” and that each new installation, property appropriations, and final contracting would require formal City Council approval.
Speakers pressed on ownership and long‑term operation: Webb framed options the city will need to consider if installations advance — for example, whether the city would own and operate hydrogen generation facilities as a municipal utility, or whether it would procure hydrogen from third parties. Webb said any policy decision and resulting installations would be subject to council review and appropriation.
Committee members said they value the technical work completed so far and want to keep grant timelines and next steps clear. The presenter said preliminary design materials are expected soon and that grant openings should occur in coming months; the consultant alerted the group that funding windows are moving quickly.
Ending: Committee members agreed to draft a proposal describing the advisory task force’s scope and to bring that proposal back to the full council for next steps. City staff will return with cost estimates and a timeline tied to the pending grant schedule.
Votes at a glance: The committee voted to reconstitute the Green Energy group as an advisory/task force to the City Council; a motion and second were recorded and the motion carried by voice vote (no roll‑call tally recorded in the transcript).
