Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Burn Ban topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McPherson County commissioners debate lifting burn ban after weekend fires; no formal vote recorded
Summary
County commissioners discussed two weekday fires, billing and criminal penalties for negligent burns and whether to lift or keep a temporary county burn ban; the board did not record a formal vote and deferred further action.
McPherson County commissioners spent more than an hour debating whether to lift a temporary burn ban after two fire calls over the previous day, but took no final vote.
The discussion centered on recent grass and field fires, the 10-day weather forecast and enforcement tools. A county firefighter told the board, “Honestly, I'm personally and as a firefighter, this makes me extremely irritated to say the least,” describing a warm, windy day when a controlled burn spread into standing crops and nearly reached a waterfowl production area. Commissioners pressed staff about red-flag warnings, enforcement and how burning fees and criminal charges would be handled.
Why it matters: commissioners weigh public-safety risk, the practical ability to enforce a ban and the economic and legal consequences of billing or prosecuting negligent burning. The county has an ordinance that triggers an automatic ban when the National Weather Service issues a red-flag or very-high grassland-fire index; speakers also warned that, even without a formal burn ban, state law can make negligent fire-setting a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Board members and local fire leaders described the recent calls and forecast-driven concerns. Several commissioners said many residents who would respect a ban already would not burn in the present dry, windy stretch; others argued that allowing burning would reduce the need to reconvene the board repeatedly. Fire department representatives and at least one caller on speaker phone recommended keeping the ban in place until the forecast improves; county staff said any charges for fire response would be billed to the responsible party when negligence is evident.
Outcome and next steps: No formal motion to lift or reinstate the county burn ban appears in the minutes. Commissioners asked staff and local fire chiefs to continue monitoring conditions and to revisit the issue if the forecast or local fire activity changes; they indicated they could call a special meeting if necessary and that they would reassess around the next scheduled meeting (May 15).
