Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears staff proposal to limit large gates and fabric mesh on private fences near alleys and easements
Summary
City staff presented an ordinance text amendment to restrict vehicle gates larger than 5 feet and to prohibit deteriorating fabric mesh or slats on chain-link fences citywide; discussion focused on scope, enforcement and impacts to sports facilities and preexisting structures.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Adam Bailey, director of planning and development services, presented a proposed code amendment (Chapter 5, Article 5) on April 21 that would: (1) prohibit private gates providing vehicle access from unimproved alleys or utility easements if the gate width exceeds 5 feet, and (2) prohibit addition of certain privacy inserts, cloth mesh or slats that deteriorate rapidly when attached to chain-link fences.
Why it matters: Staff said the amendment aims to protect unimproved alleys and utility easements from routine vehicular use that creates maintenance and health issues, and to reduce long-term blight caused by ragged fabric wind- or privacy-screens. Deputy City Manager Raymond Rivas clarified the restriction would not apply to approved metal mesh or permanent project-approved screening (for example, the city's own metal mesh installations), but would target cloth-like windscreens and other temporary materials that degrade quickly.
Details raised in council Q&A - Scope: Councilmembers asked whether the material prohibition would apply citywide (Bailey: materials prohibition applies anywhere in the city) and whether sports-complex windscreens or mesh used internally in school campuses would be affected (Rivas: permitted, long-lasting metal mesh used on school facilities would not be impacted). - Alleys and vehicle access: Deputy mayor pro tem and other councilmembers pressed staff on enforcement and why 5 feet is chosen; Bailey said the intent is to prevent residents from creating vehicular access and storage in unimproved alleys and easements and to limit unpermitted garage-like uses that cause ruts and maintenance issues. - Existing structures: Staff said the amendment would apply prospectively and not trigger enforcement sweeps to remove existing lawful structures; it is not intended to force removal of preexisting approved materials.
Next steps Staff did not present a final ordinance vote at the meeting; the item remained in discussion. Councilmembers asked staff to return with implementation details including enforcement approaches, signage costs and clarifications about exceptions for school and recreational facilities.
Ending Bailey and Rivas said the amendment is intended to be a targeted, enforceable change to reduce alley damage and visible deterioration from temporary fence inserts while preserving approved, durable screening.
