Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Cybersecurity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter alleges coordinated cyber influence and urges county action on cybersecurity grants
Summary
A public commenter told commissioners May 8 he believes a coordinated insider cyber influence campaign exists, referenced multiple national figures and programs, and praised the county’s use of infrastructure grant funding for cybersecurity while offering books and materials to commissioners.
A member of the public used the May 8 meeting’s public-comment slot to describe a personal assessment of coordinated cyber influence and information operations and to press the county on cybersecurity readiness.
The commenter identified himself as an engineer and described his remarks as professional observations. He alleged a “socially engineered insider adversary cyber attack” conducted by a group he referenced with a pejorative name and stated that the group’s naming and behavior had political and commercial links. He also made extended claims about national political figures, federal programs and alleged misuse of federal databases; these statements were made during public comment and were his assertions.
He said he appreciated the county’s effort to pursue cybersecurity updates using a grant from the bipartisan infrastructure law and offered to leave books in the county library. Commissioners and staff asked whether the books were available and acknowledged the offer; the commenter later said he would loan the books. No county action was taken in response to the public comment during the meeting beyond commissioners hearing the remarks.
The county’s formal cybersecurity action recorded in the meeting was staff noting a grant-funded cybersecurity update; the public comment was an unsolicited opinion and set of allegations by a private citizen and does not represent county policy or findings.
